SITUATIONS VACANT

In a couple of weeks, the London 2012 Olympic Games will begin. I’m not particularly looking forward to the Olympics and am not a huge fan of the cynical marketing which has surrounded the Games and the Jubilee this year.

A couple of months ago, my friend Biltawulf was wasting his life by looking at rubbish on the internet, when he discovered a special package deal on the Thomas Cook website; two tickets for the Olympic opening ceremony and a two night stay at the Athenaeum Hotel website for the bargain price of only £12,998. A normal two night stay at the same hotel, not including Olympic opening ceremony tickets, would be £737.

The itinerary for the trip is as follows:

26 July

  • Check in to your hotel. Please note you must arrive at your hotel by 18:00 on the 26th July for your accredited coach transfer to your evening meal
  • Dinner at a local restaurant

27 July

  • Breakfast at your hotel
  • Pre Ceremony Meal
  • Transfer to Olympic Park
  • 19.30 – 23.30 – Ceremony – Opening Ceremony

28 July

  • Breakfast at your hotel
  • Check out of your hotel

The Athenaeum Hotel has its own restaurant and yet the itinerary mentions a coach transfer to a “local hotel”. How “local” is this other mystery restaurant if you have to travel there by coach? And why don’t they just give you a meal in the hotel’s restaurant? It’s only downstairs. Perhaps the hotel’s restaurant was already fully booked, or it might even be closed that evening. Biltawulf decided to check to see if the restaurant was open. A few minutes later, I received the following email:

Rather than simply checking to see if there were tables available at the restaurant that evening, Bilta decided to book a table for four.

I assume he booked a table for four, because although Bilta and I are friends, we’re not really the sort of friends who would go to a fairly smart restaurant for dinner together. By booking a table for four, Bilta carefully avoided putting undue pressure on our friendship. But whilst he solved that problem, another problem presents itself; there are now two empty seats at our table.

We need to fill those seats, and that is where YOU come in.

YOU can apply to have dinner with Biltawulf and me. Please bear in mind that we are not offering to pay for you to have dinner with us, you will have to pay for yourself. We are also not offering to pay for your travel or any other costs you may incur. We are not offering you anything whatsoever. We just need to fill the two empty seats at our table so it looks like we have friends.

If that sounds like something you are interested in, go HERE for more information and to apply online (deadline is 12noon on 21st July 2012).

Good luck!

TRS GARLIC PICKLE

I think I have developed an addiction to TRS Garlic Pickle.

I cannot explain the power this stuff has over me. It has me in its grip. I am addicted.

If you have never tried TRS Garlic Pickle, then you have no idea how lucky you are. Don’t ever try it. Stay how you are. It’s too late for me now, but you can remain pure. Honestly, don’t try it. It’s not even nice. I don’t like it. It’s horrible. Of course it’s horrible, it’s garlic pickle. But I just keep shovelling spoonfuls of the stuff into my mouth.

Possibly, you’re not really meant to eat it by the spoonful, direct from the jar. I think you’re just meant to use it to accompany a meal:

GARLIC PICKLE
TRS Pickles are a delicious mix of fruits and vegetables carefully preserved in oil and vinegar, then blended in exotic spices. They make ideal accompaniments to Indian meals, cold meals, fish, salads, sandwiches, cheese and barbecued dishes.

Free from artificial colours, flavours and preservatives. The manufacturing site handles nuts and sesame.

Suitable for vegetarians.

Store in a cool dry place. Once opened, refrigerate below 5°C and use within 6 weeks. We take great care to ensure TRS products reach you in perfect condition. In case of complaint please return jar and contents, stating where and when purchased. We will gladly replace and refund postage. Your statutory rights are unaffected.

Produced in India for:
TRS Wholesale Co. Ltd, Southall, Middlesex, UB2 4AX, UK
http://www.trs.co.uk

The TRS website features a video celebrating fifty glorious years of the company, although it doesn’t help explain why TRS Garlic Pickle is so addictive.

I wondered if there was something in the ingredients which got me hooked:

INGREDIENTS
Garlic, Red chilli, Mustard crushed, Fenugreek crushed, Cumin powder, Coriander powder, Asafoetida, Water, Edible oil, Acetic acid, Sodium benzoate, Salt

I like all of those things. Except for asafoetida. I’m not sure what asafoetida is. According to Wikipedia, asafoetida is a kind of latex gum which is produced by the underground roots of a number of herbaceous plants and is also known by the contradictory names “devil’s dung”, “stinking gum” and “food of the gods”. It has “a pungent, unpleasant smell when raw”, but when it is cooked, “it delivers a smooth flavor, reminiscent of leeks”. I’m not sure if the asafoetida in TRS Garlic Pickle is cooked or raw, however I will say that I have been unable to detect any leek flavour in the product.

LOST BAGUETTE

Sitting on the train this morning, I looked out of the window and saw a baguette lying on the opposite platform:

It’s not a great photo, I apologise, I had to take it quickly before the train pulled away.

I have no idea how the sandwich appeared there, I assume it was dropped by accident. I suppose there’s a possibility it was left there deliberately. A rejected baguette. Unwanted. But that seems unlikely. If you were throwing away a sandwich you didn’t want, you’d either put it in the bin, or sling it over the fence or into the bushes, or kick it onto the tracks, you wouldn’t drop it like that, right in the middle of a train platform.

Assuming it was an accident, what happened? Was it someone getting on or off the train, the baguette in their hands when it slipped? Getting on the train seems more likely. Again, if they were getting off the train, they wouldn’t leave it lying there. It suggests someone getting on the train and being separated from their lunch as the doors closed. Their forlorn face pressed up to the glass. A tear rolling down their cheek as the train left the station. A journey filled with regret. The day ruined.

Or maybe the sandwich fell out of their bag unnoticed, and some poor soul spent the morning thinking about how much they were looking forward to tucking into their baguette. Finally, at lunchtime, they opened their bag only to find it empty. Then the questions, the confusion. “I swear I put that baguette in my bag. I remember doing it, I definitely remember it. Where did it go?” A colleague walks past, eating a baguette of their own. Accusations of theft, deceit. A friendship over. Lives altered forever.

I suppose there is also the possibility, although remote, that the sandwich wasn’t actually lost. Maybe it had got to the station independently. A sandwich on its way to work. Unlikely, I admit, but it would explain where the baguettes in Upper Crust come from and why their branches are so often located in train stations.

TRIFLE

Last night, I had a conversation on Twitter about trifle.

It came about in response to this tweet:

I’m not hugely keen on trifle either, and so I sympathise with Casper. It’s the sponge, you see. I don’t like the sponge.

If you’re not familiar with trifle, Wikipedia explains:

Trifle is a dessert dish made from thick (or often solidified) custard, fruit, sponge cake, fruit juice or gelatin, and whipped cream. These ingredients are usually arranged in layers with fruit and sponge on the bottom, and custard and cream on top.

There is also a photo to illustrate:

This trifle has been decorated with orange and lemon jelly slices, which can be used to add sweet, zesty flavour and a colourful sparkling finish to cakes, cupcakes, lemon tarts and gateaux. Or, in this case, a trifle.

Back to the sponge. In a traditional (although as Wikipedia explains, not the original) trifle recipe, sponge forms the base layer. This is then covered variously in layers of jelly, fruit, cream and custard. Sometimes the sponge is soaked in sherry. The consequence of soaking a sponge cake in sherry and covering it in jelly and custard is that the sponge goes soggy. I am not suggesting anything radical here. This is just a matter of physics. For some, this may be an attractive proposition – soggy sponge. But I don’t like it, in fact, I’d prefer trifle without sponge. I’m not saying my view on this matter is so strong that I refuse to eat trifle which does contain sponge, just that I make sure to eat the sponge first, so that the trifle is “safe”.

I have always eaten systematically. “Front loading” the early mouthfuls with whichever element I liked least, saving the ones I liked best for last. As a child, I would take this to extremes, eating all of one thing, then all of another, with favoured items untouched until the end (so, say, an English breakfast would be eaten in this order: all of the beans, all of the tomato, all of the egg, all of the mushrooms, all of the sausage, all of the bacon – these last two could be swapped round if it looked like a nice sausage). This systematic approach often irritated my sister, who adopted a different method (if eating sausage, mash and beans, she would chop the sausage up into little bits and stir the mash and the beans and sausage chunks up into a revolting goo, smothering it with ketchup). I gradually relaxed my food policy, or at least made it more subtle. I still “front load” my early mouthfuls, and the whole time as I eat, I continue to attempt to identify which item I shall leave until the very end. I also try to avoid contamination. Sacrificing a chip or two to create a dam, protecting the others from encroaching beans.

I attempted to explain my sponge worries, but the 140 character limit on Twitter made it difficult. I suggested a trifle without sponge, but this was mocked. I felt alienated and rejected. I don’t think I have ever felt so alone.

I thought of Twilight Zone: The Movie. I watched it years ago on video and haven’t seen it since, so don’t really remember too much of it. However, one story popped back into my head. A guy in a bar starts mouthing off, making racist comments to his friends. He leaves the bar and finds himself in Europe in the 1940s. SS officers appear and start chasing him, having identified him as Jewish. Then he’s transported to the deep south of America, where members of the Ku Klux Klan see him as black and form a lynch mob. Then he’s in Vietnam and attacked by US soldiers. This racist man finds himself in a variety of situations where he is the victim of the prejudice he bitterly directs at others.

At that moment, rejected on Twitter because of my extreme views about trifle, I realised I was the sponge.

100% GUILT FREE

Knowingly directing tourists the wrong way guilt?

This is an advert for McCains Rustic Oven Chips. I like McCains Rustic Oven Chips. They’re probably my favourite rustic oven chips. I have no problem with the chips. I like the chips. I don’t like this advert though.

I don’t think I have ever knowingly directed tourists the wrong way. Why would I? How does it benefit me? I may, on occasion, have pretended not to know where somewhere was because the route is quite complicated and it would be impossible to explain and anyway, if ever anyone asks for directions, they stop listening once you get past “OK, well, you carry on up that way and then turn right”. There might also be times when I have misunderstood where it was they were wanting to go and given them accurate directions to somewhere else. I might even have realised this immediately after but felt too self-conscious to correct my mistake. Here, you could argue I have knowingly allowed tourists to go in the wrong direction, but I would argue that, on a moral level, that is not the same as knowingly giving them wrong directions in the first place. One is based on social embarrassment and self-consciousness, the other is just mean.

There can only be one reason why someone would knowingly give tourists the wrong directions, and that is because they think it is funny to do so. They think it’s funny to inconvenience total strangers. They don’t care that they won’t actually be able to see the moment where the tourists get completely lost, they are satisfied just to know that somewhere, someone is having a shitty time all because of them.

None of this has much to do with chips, you might think. McCains Rustic Oven Chips contain 3% fat. This is quite good apparently. I’m not sure how much fat other oven chips contain, but I’m fairly sure it’s more than 3%. Because these chips are relatively low in fat, it means you can eat them without feeling guilty. Guilt. This campaign is all about guilt.

McCains have set up a Facebook page where people can confess their guilty secret and win a trip to New York. The theory seems to be, that because there is no need to feel guilty for eating the chips, we should somehow celebrate the other things we feel guilty about. It’s almost as if they believe that humans need a certain minimum level of guilt in order to operate, and by removing the guilt from eating chips, we need to maintain that guilt level by rejoicing in every other shitty thing we’ve ever done.

“Rustic Farmer Ben” doesn’t even look like he feels guilty. Look at his face:

Look at that smug, self-satisfied smirk on his face. That’s not the face of a man racked with guilt. That’s the face of a smug bastard. Fuck you, Rustic Farmer Ben.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 159 other followers

%d bloggers like this: